Glyphosate in Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie Rivers not coming from EAA

Guest Commentary

Posted 4/6/21

Going down another rabbit hole to connect the dots between sugar industry’s use of glyphosate in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) and impacts to manatees...

To Our Valued Readers –

Visitors to our website will be limited to five stories per month unless they opt to subscribe.

For $5.99, less than 20 cents a day, subscribers will receive unlimited access to SouthCentralFloridaLife.com, including exclusive content from our newsroom.

Our commitment to balanced, fair reporting and local coverage provides insight and perspective not found anywhere else.

Your financial commitment will help to preserve the kind of honest journalism produced by our reporters and editors. We trust you agree that independent journalism is an essential component of our democracy.

Please click here to subscribe.

Sincerely,
Katrina Elsken, Editor-in-Chief, Independent Newsmedia

Please log in to continue

Log in
I am anchor

Glyphosate in Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie Rivers not coming from EAA

Guest Commentary

Posted

Going down another rabbit hole to connect the dots between sugar industry’s use of glyphosate in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) and impacts to manatees just further distracts from true South Florida Ecosystem Restoration efforts.

As a retired scientist who worked for the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) for 31 years, the last 25 of them focused on Everglades Restoration, I’ve seen my fair share of scientific studies. I was proud to work for one of the nation’s premier water management agencies that is responsible for managing water in one of our nation’s largest and most complex systems. I spent many years as an estuarine scientist in the REstorationCOordinationVERification (RECOVER) program which I headed up as program manager until 2020.

During my tenure at the SFWMD, water managers based decisions on data and sound science. The Agency’s goal is to balance the many competing water needs of the system and make science-based decisions that benefit the broader public over any particular single interest.

A recent study published in Environmental International (data collected in 2019 and 2020 in the Caloosahatchee River and estuary (CRE), the St. Lucie River and estuary (SLE) and two storm water treatment areas south of the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) has found higher concentrations of glyphosate in the Florida manatee than past studies (2009-2019) which evaluated manatee samples from Southern Georgia, Crystal River and Brevard County, Florida. This study has received some attention in the media due to its attempts to explain that the higher concentrations in manatees sampled in the CRE and SLE were due to the use of glyphosate in agricultural sugarcane farming practices in the EAA.

What struck me from the article was not just that glyphosate was being detected in increased levels in the Florida manatee, but it appears the authors were trying to connect this comprehensive issue specifically to the sugar industry located south of the lake in the (EAA). Glyphosate is the most popular herbicide in existence today. It’s popularity is the result of characteristics such as a short half life, it is used in most agriculture as well as by many others users as the authors point out and may have measurable negative impacts to the environment. There are numerous studies currently underway which should help to clarify these impacts.

Additionally, the study’s findings conflict with decades of data published by SFWMD. The study examines locations of Lake Okeechobee Discharges, in particular the CRE and SLE but water from areas south of Lake Okeechobee, where the EAA sugar farms are located, generally does not go north into Lake Okeechobee and thus is not released into the Caloosahatchee or St. Lucie. In fact, between the time period of 1983 to 2017 waters from the EAA only contributed 6 percent of the total volume and if you look at the more recent time frame of 2005 to present that has dropped to 4 percent. During the study period, there was no back pumping through structures from the EAA into Lake Okeechobee therefore it’s difficult to accept the link of EAA farming practices to these Manatees recently studied in the CRE and SLE.

On average 60 to 70 percent of the flows discharging to the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie Estuaries originate from local basin runoff with the rest being supplied by Lake Okeechobee with inflows primarily coming from basins North, East and West of the lake.

Concentrations of glyphosate to the Caloosahatchee and St. Lucie Estuaries would more likely come from aquatic weeds spraying on the lake and canals, agricultural sources north, east and west of the lake, or any number of other sources, including golf courses, and residential and commercial development in these watersheds. Without the use of specific tracers it would be impossible to determine where the glyphosate originated.

The article seems to lack data to indicate that farming south of Lake Okeechobee has any impact on manatees sampled in the SLE and CRE. The highest levels found (before sugar cane harvest) occurred during the wettest months which correspond to freshwater discharges to the estuaries from the local watersheds and/or Lake Okeechobee.

For our children, grandchildren and all future residents of the state we need to continue and ramp up all local efforts to improve water quality as well as move forward rapidly to implement the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. If glyphosate is causing problems in our environment and even possibly to humans as some studies suggest it is not just a sugar industry issue as it is used throughout the entire agricultural and urban landscape by both private and public entities as indicated in the article. Let’s not waste precious time going down another rabbit hole.

Comments